Obamageddon- Gerald Celente Predicts Obamageddon And Total Economic Collapse

Judging by your post, we'll soon have enough nuts to leave out for our bar patrons.

Your newsletter. I would like to subscribe to it.

JB

Please learn to use spell check and stuff like capitals and punctuation. Your posts have the quality of a not-so-bright, 3rd grade immigrant.

but make no doubt this is 100% bush's depression..

Easy to blame one man and hard to swallow a democratic controlled Senate during Bush's final two years as President. Sadly it was a democratic agenda that continued to get laid upon Bush's desk. He and the republicans had no backbone in staving off the ridiculous laws for him to sign. I hold him more responsible for not exercising his power of veto.

Now with a democrat President and a democrat controlled Senate, we're getting spending bills being unchecked and not even completely read and re-read. Riddled with a Marxist tone. They're being signed off on in the middle of the night and before the US citizens can question what's written, without any fulfilled "promised" transparency or the seven days for the public to digest.

Easy to blame one man and hard to swallow a democratic controlled Senate during Bush's final two years as President. Sadly it was a democratic agenda that continued to get laid upon Bush's desk.

And got repeatedly vetoed. The collapse started in 2007, when the Democrats had (barely) controlled Congress for only a few months. No, the roots of the problem go back a lot further than that.

Yes, our economic woes are rooted much further back. Some to say with Carter on opening the door for groups like ACORN. I think with every administration there are going to be conflicts in policy. Now we're learning some issues much deeper and long standing. But Bushes veto's were the fewest for any President. None IMO were core economy based veto's.

http://uspolitics.about.com/od/electionissues/tp/Bush-Vetos.htm

Thanks for the laugh, Easyjett. It is fun to watch the spinning. Our economic woes are all the fault of Obama (in office 6 months) or the Democratic Congress (2 1/2 years). No, wait!!! It's the fault of Clinton, ten years ago. No, Carter, 30 years ago (ignore the three Republican presidents since then).

It is so convenient that we had a Republican president for 8 years, and a GOP Congress for 12, and they had absolutely nothing to do with where we are today!!!! Amazing.

So what were they doing?

Dave I can excuse your lack of intelligence and reading and comprehension abilities. You got enough liberal talking points off there you clearly defined you are brain washed and your mind is closed to any real debate.

Go back and read my post again. I'm sorry there's not a pop-up book version for you to understand the words that were written.

I commented on your willful lies about Bush's veto's. I'm sorry I produced evidence to contrary of what you wrote and believe. I actually gave you the benefit of the doubt that you didn't know Bush's veto history. Now we both know it didn't matter, you are a foaming liberal.

Bush's vetos were the fewest in history because he spent 75% of his administration with his own party controlling Congress. Once the Dems took control of Congress he started vetoing, seven within the first year of Dem control, to send a clear and quick message that they wouldn't get anything by him. You want to blame the Democratic Congress. They did nothing without his permission. They couldn't.

But, of course, that isn't true if I'm a "foaming liberal". Apparently you feel that only conservatives are allowed to notice what goes on in the government.